|
A fund may underperformance due to a
number of factors, not all of which point equally toward
a decision to sell. The first thing that has to be kept
in mind is that past performance is not an indication
of the future nor does it guarantee future success.
Yet, past performance is one of the most useful guides
investors have, as it reflects a fund’s portfolio
management skills, for better or for worse.
To evaluate how a fund has done, its
performance should be looked at only in relation to
others in its category. If a scheme consistently performs
below its peers over the same period one should consider
having a relook at that investment.
You should check to see how the whole
sector in question is doing, and how your fund is performing
compared to other funds in that sector. If your fund
finishes in the bottom 25 per cent for performance in
that group, a red flag should go up. However, try to
find out why its performance has suffered it could be
one stock's bad performance which affects the entire
fund's returns.
If a scheme is consistently underperforming
its peers by a significant margin, find out why. If
it stems from an understandable strategy, it might make
sense to stay invested. But if the fund manager or the
portfolio cannot provide a reasonable explanation, cut
losses. Staying invested in an underperforming scheme
involves an opportunity cost. You can well get out of
that scheme and look at one that has been improving
its performance.
|